Friday, January 3, 2014

Should Human Cloning Be Banned Or It Should Be Permitted?

kind-heartedity re-create and its ruin to SocietyIntroductionIn 2002 , professorship George W . provide gave a televised rescue at the White Ho using up . The computer address tackled a very contr on the whole all oversial issue--- kind-hearted clone . He palisaded against authorship clone and urged the Congress to approve the bill aiming to ban all(prenominal) bes of serviceman retroflex . He confided that tender-hearted re-create is unethical , emphasizing the onto ingredientsis of homophile heart . He insisted that the solidifying properties of therapeutic copy (i .e , seek clone ) shed no strong tale and , supposing that it can bring round , would muchover last to exploitation of women ( scouring 48 still , despite his strong arguments , the bill was non go awayed President Bush is non alone in his belief that sym avenueetic clone should be banned many deal believe that mankind clone is detrimental to society and against ethical and spiritual surveys . however , a number of scientists believe that its risks outlying(prenominal) outweigh the benefitsAlthough we promptly live in the modern sidereal day and technology is evolving fast our demand to a better biography should non take international our need for haughtiness recognition , in brokerral , and medicine , in particular , get under ones skin come a long way and accomplished so much . What utilise to be fatal diseases argon instantaneously as lento to cure as common colds . and , volume should exercise chasteness and non abuse this occasion . There must be balance betwixt aesculapian advances and gentlemans gentlemanity . It should be remembered that the intent of research is to improve invigoration , and non to violate our cosmos charitableThe Process of copyIn copy , deoxyribonuc leic acid is taken from any jail cell (exce! pt germ cells ) in the clay These cells atomic number 18 called somatic cells . Diploid DNA from these cells is and so inserted to a tender glob cell in which the nucleus is already withdraw , a service called somatic cell nuclear conveyancing . In this process , the DNA of the nucleus from the somatic cells is transferred to the enucleated egg cell . Thus , the egg is now diploid , substance it contains twain DNAs , and becomes an embryo . The man-to-man upgraded becomes identical to only the giver (Rantala and Milgram 15In the natural process of embryo formation , the spermatozoanatozoon and the egg for each one learn one copy (or half(prenominal) ) of the DNA necessary for inheritable coding . When the egg and sperm argon united , an embryo is formed , a diploid cell that accordingly divides to form a comp permite kind-hearted being (Rantala and Milgram 17Reproductive re-create is the process of producing an individual in a laboratory coifting , whereas the purpose of therapeutic clone is to stimulate cloned embryos which would be the source of ascendant cells . After the derriere cells were acquired , the embryos atomic number 18 to be destroyedSome biotechnological companies oblige already started creating embryonic homosexual clones . embryotic clones , produced from rabbit eggs and human DNA were created to produce root cells . Moreover , many companies fateed to produce cloned children ( crowd together and Lester 151 worshipAgainst the humankindistic ViewAfter the ascendant cells sop up been harvested from the cloned embryo , it would be destroyed and the stem cells would theoretically be developed into any tissue needed to cure a certain disease . all the same , the actual preaching is yet to be seen and has no strong proof from the scientific clan . According to the humanistic principle , an action should be chosen based on the promise of the greatest observe . These views be app bent in the advocates of clone . Christians think that these large number wo! uld do just about anything because of their desire to cure , lust for dexterity , and need to make a pioneer intention . From a Christian s perspective , all purportspan is a commit from divinity , created in His consider : graven image verbalise , ` allow us make man in our word picture , in our likeness .So God created man in his profess image , in the image of God he created him male soulfulness and female he created them (Genesis 1 :26-27 . Not only does clone not ca-ca a substantial therapeutic ass , it overly destroys human biography---that of the embryo (Cole-Turner 80 . Because Christians believe that basis are created in God s image , they place cheer not as much on the contri besidesions to society save on the identity created in the likeness of God honorable BoundaryPaul Ramsey , a Protestant theologian , argued that copy crosses several moral boundaries of soulfulness-person and person-God . First , re-create requires controlled breeding to se rve scientific needs . Second , the unhatched would be subject to nontherapeutic experimentation . Third , it demoralizes the meaning of credit line and cuts the confederation between replica and sexual expression . quaternate , clone is a sin of pride and , fifth , a sin of self-cosmos , seen as a man s quest to be a man-God (14 playing GodThe following religious beliefs that warn against humans deal God especially in the context of human re-create1 . The grave secrets of life belong to God alone2 . public have no proper to decide as to the beginning and ending of life3 . worldly concern are fallible and subject to their self-interested perspectives4 . Humans do not have the knowledge of outcomes of actions , which is attri excepted to God s omni intelligence5 . Humans do not have control of the outcomes of actions , which is attributed to God s omnipotenceHuman DignityThe Roman Catholics viewed re-create as a violation of human high-handedness . With re-create , the leftover identity of the clone and the donor is! jeopardized The concern of the Catholic church service building is on the individuality of the person and how he or she pass on be treated . Moreover , copy is seen as a violation of the sanctity of life . Conditions must be set to prevent accidental injury to persons created done re-create . Also , other violation of human dignity is through markification . Treating clones as an object is against the religious principle of dignity and secular principle of esteem (Ramsey 14ProcreationThe more or less popular religious argument against cloning is procreation Marriage includes sexual roll in the hay and procreation , which are in and of itself linked . In cloning , procreation becomes uncorrupted rejoinderBiotechnologyAdult floor CellsThere are a dope of biotechnological research that are some(prenominal) promising and ethical . Human cloning need not be the way in the proceeds of human life . In fact , the National Institutes of wellness (NIH ) started to fund nume rous puppet and human bad stem cell research some argue that therapeutic cloning is essential to study stem cells However , stem cells that are taken from newborn babies have shown strength in animal studies and clinical trials . Unlike human cloning in adult stem cells , the human embryos are not destroyed . Moreover , the tissues have the ability to be transplanted without rejection and are more respective(a) . The therapies that resulted from the stem cells are now destiny cure people (Bush 50Genes and the Environment furthermore , by focusing on gene replacements , some researchers seem to forget the relation between genetic factors and the environment . Several studies have been conducted , and these researchers should use the knowledge of the tie-up of gene and environment in the prevention of diseases and development of medical checkup therapies for people (Porritt 123Dark PathAlso , the overeagerness of the advocates of cloning of human embryos is disturbing . At j ib , the cloned embryos used are 12 days old . If thi! s is refreshing , in that respect would be a high probability that scientists advocating for cloning would want to try embryos that are 10 weeks old then 5 months old , and so on if they deem it more useful for medical purposes (Rifkin 40 . Imagine harvesting organs from fetuses of that ageEthical IssuesExploitation of WomenThe position of the social conservative in the issue of human cloning is understandable . However , even progressive leftists chafe ethical issues about the problems that cloning would cause to women . Because women s eggs are very important in the cloning process , if permitted , women may be exploited and given unethical incentives to undergo preaching and surgery that are life-threatening (Rantala and Milgram 110Human manners as a CommodityAn important ethical concern in human cloning is the reduction of the evaluate of human life into a genuine commodity . The cloning process and the cloned embryos mean big commercial-grade enterprise to large corporations . Humans would lose control over the process of reproduction to corporations which spare the process and the product (Rifkin 43In cloning , the ferocity is on the production of life , as contend to the creation of life . Similar to assembly line , embryos would be produced to precondition and would be under quality control and have inevitable outcomes . In essence , people would no perennial produce a unique human being , but an engineered reproduction (Stock and Campbell 96The power to create a human life would steadily dwindle until it is completely gone . The embryos would become manufacture products that are designed in advance and can be bought in the biologic market . Life would be bioindustrialized by spacious biotechnological companies and members of the scientific community . In fact , life science companies have already patented stem cells and cloned human embryos and place these as inventions (Rifkin 45 . From here , it is not fractious to cry t hat these companies would take the sole power in the ! evolutionary process indubitables and the hereafter of medical examination ResearchThe story of the patenting of the cloning process and the cloned embryos and stem cells started from a small biotech follow in the united Kingdom created in 1988 . The Roslin Bio-Med , an institution funded by the establishment , was the caller-out which cloned a sheep named dame . After a socio-economic class , the company was sold to a U .S . company , Geron . By the year 2000 the British Patent Office gave a patent to Dr . Ian Wilmut for the technology of cloning . Geron now owned the process and all the animals it produced . Moreover , Wilmut and Geron were also a disposed(p) to all cloned human embryos . United Kingdom was the foremost country to sanction the use of embryos for harvesting stem cells and the front to treat a human embryo as an mind situation (Magnus et al . 167Michael westside , founder of Geron , left the company and started to secure patents on his company s (Advance d Cell Technology ) research on non-human embryo cloning .
bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
Furthermore , he also began studying alternative ship canal of creating stem cells . Through these patents , these two companies may dictate the path of medical research on stem cells and have the monopoly in the biotech field proclaiming Human LifePatents to cloned human embryos have already been granted to companies This raises an ethical as well as a policy-making question of whether corporations can own as an intellectual property a likely human life . During the 19th snow , questions have been raised regarding the issue of bondage , owning a person from induce . At present , thraldom all over the wo! rld is illegal . However , governments are giving the reclaim to own a life between conception and birth . Companies should not be allowed to own cells that are integral to the biological composition that makes a human life . If this trend continues , in the end , the biotech companies will own the move , designs , and the processes that produce the human lifeEugenics CivilizationAlthough the focus of debates on human cloning is on the right to life some are claustrophobic of other potential huge consequences on society . Many scientists and biotech companies from the United States and the United Kingdom are developing a framework for a commercial eugenics by using stem cell technologyEugenics is be by Sir Francis Galton as the elimination of hateful traits and the addition of plummy traits to improve the characteristics of a species (Rifkin 46 . This would doubtless have threatening implications to human nicety . Furthermore , this is not much diametric from Adolf Hitler s plan to create the master accelerate Unfortunately , corporations have been discussing the possibility of a eugenics movement discreetlyCloning-Related LawsSeveral bills in the United States have been drafted , but never passed to ban human cloning . However , California has already passed a justice against cloning in 1998 , and several states are considering similar laws (Roberts 53The European Community prohibits granting patents to animals that were genetically altered . In 1996 , the American Medical Association (AMA ) has successfully lobbied in the Congress the passing of a legislation limiting patents to medical procedures . In 1998 , the U .S . food for thought and drug Administration (FDA ) announced that it would regulate cloning Furthermore , national official law does not allow allocation of national funds to human embryo research (Roberts 60ConclusionHuman cloning is a very significant issue at this clip . Allowing could influence us to a path which we co uld no longer correspond from . Thus , it is impera! tive that human cloning be scrutinized most for our futureReligious thinkers believe that human cloning violates human dignity and the value of love and procreation . Theologians have warned us against playing God . Moreover , human cloning goes beyond the moral boundaries in which people live byIn an ethical perspective , people should not allow demeaning the value of life . We should not let life be treated as a hang on , designed and manufactured like assembly types . Importantly , no one has the right to patent and own life . This could pass on to serious consequences such as a eugenic civilization , which certain companies have already been planning to createSadly , there are few laws worldwide that ban human cloning . Bills were not supported in Congress , although people from varied maestro religious , and political perspectives support its banning . The risks of human cloning far outweigh its potential benefits . It is about time that people take communal action and le aders own the harm it can do to people and to the societyWorks CitedBush , George W . some(prenominal) Human Reproductive Cloning and Therapeutic Cloning Should BeBanned modern-day Issues coadjutor : Cloning . Ed . Sylvia Engdahl Detroit : Greenhaven Press , 2006Cole-Turner , Ronald . Ed . Human Cloning : Religious Responses . Louisville KY : Westminster rump Knox , 1997Cole-Turner , Ronald . Beyond Cloning : Religion and the Remaking of universe . HarrisburgPA : Trinity Press International , 2003Galton , D .J . In Our Own Image : Eugenics and the Genetic Modification of pack . LondonLittle , Brown , 2001Hefley , James and Lane Lester . Human Cloning : contend God or Scientific Progress ? GrandRapids , MI : Fleming H . Ravell , 1998Magnus , David , Caplan , Arthur and Glenn McGee . Eds . Who Owns Life Amherst , NYPrometheus Books , 2002Rifkin , Jeremy . Human Cloning Will Harm Society oppose Viewpoints : GeneticEngineering . Ed . Louise I . Gerdes . San Diego : Greenhave n Press , 2005Porritt , Jonathon . Playing Safe : le! arning and the Environment . London Thames Hudson2000Rantala , M .L . and Arthur J . Milgram . Eds . Cloning : For and Against Chicago : Open Court1999Roberts , Melinda . Child Versus Childmaker : approaching Persons and Present Duties in morality andthe Law . Lanham , MD : Rowman Littlefield , 1998Ramsey ,. Moral Implications of Genetic command Genetics and the Future of Man . Ed . JohnD . Roslansky . New York : Appleton-Century-Croffs , 1966Stock , Gregory and John Campbell . Engineering the Human Germline : An Exploration of theScience and Ethics of Altering the Genes We submit to Our Children . New York : OxfordUniversity Press , 2000PAGEPAGE 1 ...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.